ADIDAS ADIZERO SONIC 3 606001 WOMENS RUNNING ATHLETIC SHOES Size 6.5Adidas Women Running Shoes Galaxy 4 Training Work Out Fitness New Gym B43832 Runadidas VS Switch Womens Shoes Girls Sneakers D97419,adidas FortaRun CF K Wide Strap Navy White Royal Kids Junior Running Shoe CQ0001,ADIDAS Women's Terrex Agravic Speed Trail Running Shoes, Black/White,PUMA SKY II HI women's US 11 $129,Adidas Women's Ligra 5 Ankle-High Mesh Volleyball Shoe,vintage Adidas Lady Boston Trainer Sneakers Blue White Women size 9,Adidas Originals Women's Alphabounce AMS Grey Gym Shoes Size 6.5 - CG4236,NEW Adidas Tubular Viral Womens Shoes Metallic Silver/Core White Size 7 (S75907)adidas Women's Edge Lux W Running Shoes, 4 Colors,Women's Adidas EQT Racing ADV Primeknit Shoes Size 9 (Fits Like 10) Cream, Blue,NEW Adidas Tubular Invader 2.0 Black / Silver Womens Shoes (BB2068) SIZE 6 - NIBUS:7 adidas Originals Women's FLB RUNNING SHOES *RUN 1/2 BIGGER FIts 7.5*,Adidas Gymbreaker 2 W Women Running Shoes White/Grey sz 9, 10,Adidas Bankshot 2.0 M19063 Silver/Black/Red WMNs US5.5 NEW RITA ORA,NEW ADIDAS NEO BLACK SUEDE Cloudfoam Memory Footbed Tennis Shoes US 7 or 8 $100,adidas originals women shoes brand new size 6. Super cool looking!EDGE LUX CLIMA - Adidas,ICON BOUNCE W - Adidas,Adidas Women Running Shoes Duramo Lite 2.0 Training Fashion CG4054 Fitness Gym,Adidas Women Cloudfoam Lite Racer Slip On Shoes (8 B(M) US, Black/White),S79132 Originals EQT Support RF Running Women Shoes SneakersWomens ADIDAS COUNTRY OG W Halpin/White Textile Suede Trainers S32200,Adidas Alphabounce 1 Reigning Champ CG5329 Womens Running Shoe 8.5US White/Gray,adidas Originals Women's Lite Racer Running Shoe, - Choose SZ/Color,adidas Women's Alphabounce 1 W - Choose SZ/Color,Adidas Core Grace Womens Running Trainers Sneakers BB3876,Women's Adidas adidas athletics 24-7 - Red - Width: med - Running,adidas Originals WMNS Superstar 80s women lifestyle sneakers NEW black BB2057,

New Adidas Blue AdizeroWomen's Feather J Running Blue Adidas Sneakers Shoes Sz 6.5 b8434f

Researchers talk of ‘biological annihilation’ as study reveals billions of populations of animals have been lost in recent decades

This article is over 1 year old

A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is under way and is more severe than previously feared, according to research.

Scientists analysed both common and rare species and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilisation, with just a short window of time in which to act.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilisation”.

Prof Gerardo Ceballos, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”

Previous studies have shown species are becoming extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years before, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.

The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50% of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades. Detailed data is available for land mammals, and almost half of these have lost 80% of their range in the last century. The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.

The scientists conclude: “The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe.”

They say, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good: “All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life.”

Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3000 species that indicated that 50% of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work but was based on different IUCN data. He agreed strong language is needed: “We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw.”

Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial, and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.

Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb but said it had been successful in its central aim – alerting people to global environmental issues and the the role of human population in them. His message remains blunt today: “Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot.”